首頁
關于我們
公司簡介
技(jì)術(shù)平台
公司榮譽
發展曆程
管理(lǐ)團隊
産品中心
心血管介入
外周血管介入
神經介入
非血管介入
新聞資訊
公司新聞
行(xíng)業資訊
學術(shù)論文
加入我們
公司環境
員工發展
招聘崗位
聯系我們
聯系方式
在線留言
EN
Real world clinical performance of the zotarolimus eluting coronary stent system in Chinese patients: a prospective, multicenter registry study
Early clinical trials with the Endeavor zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES) in western populations demonstrated low rates of target lesion revascularization with a favorable safety profile including low late stent thrombosis with up to 5 years of follow-up. The aim of this clinical registry study was to evaluate real world clinical performance of the ZES coronary system in Chinese patients.
2016
08-12
Six-month outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in treating single de novo lesions in human coronary artery
We aimed to investigate short-term outcomes of the XINSOEB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in human coronary artery.
Stent Thrombosis With Drug-Eluting Stents and Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis of 147 Trials.
This study sought to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the relative safety and efficacy of contemporary DES and BVS.
2015
08-04
Outcomes with bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents Insights from randomized trials
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been shown to be non-inferior to second generation drug eluting stents in recent clinical trials. However, the trials were not powered for individual endpoints and there is concern for increased device thrombosis with BVS.
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaff olds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled
Bioresorbable coronary stents might improve outcomes of patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions. The everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold is the most studied of these stent platforms; however, its performance versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents remains poorly defined. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with ischaemic heart disease treated with percutaneous revascularisation.
A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimuseluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan
superior long-term results compared with permanent metallic drug-eluting stents (DESs). However, whether BVSs are as safe and effective as metallic DESs prior to complete bioresorption is unknown.
08-03